Author: Stan

Today’s quick review: About Time. Shortly after Tim’s (Domhnall Gleeson) 21st birthday, his father (Bill Nighy) reveals that the men in their family have the ability to travel back in time. Equipped with unlimited second chances, Tim sets out to make a life of his own and falls madly in love with Mary (Rachel McAdams), the woman of his dreams.

About Time is a fantasy romance about a young man who can revisit the past. Warned by his father to only use his power on things that will make him truly happy, Tim goes searching for love, only to find it when he meets Mary on a blind date. About Time follows Tim as he navigates growing up, using his power to fix mistakes and learning what not to change. Excellent craftsmanship and an original premise make About Time a great pick.

About Time shows sound judgment throughout. Tim proves to be a reliable custodian of his powers, never using them in a way that cheapens the story or makes him a worse person. The plot shows a great deal of forethought, with time travel mechanics that only get more interesting as the movie goes on and personal relationships that deepen in captivating ways. There are no cheap tricks or shortcuts, only rock-solid stoytelling.

And the story is well worth telling. About Time is not ambitious. Its scope only includes Tim and his family and friends. But within that limited sphere, the story is insightful and fulfilling. It captures important facts about life and love in a remarkably clever way, and it does so with only a few pinches of well-placed drama. Finally, the casting is impeccable; Domhnall Gleeson, Bill Nighy, and Rachel McAdams all shine.

About Time is an unassuming film with a lot to offer the right viewer. Anyone looking for a sentimental story with a smart premise, an optimistic tone, and a steady stream of good humor should look no farther. Not everyone will appreciate what About Time is going for, but anyone with a taste for the sweet side of romance would do well to give it a watch.

For a romantic comedy about a man caught in a time loop, check out Groundhog Day. For a charming romance about a young woman trying to help the people around her, try Amelie. For a romantic comedy about a man with countless second chances, try 50 First Dates. For a romantic comedy about a man with just one, try Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. For a comedy with similar themes, try Hector and the Search for Happiness.

[7.8 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2194499/). I give it a 7.5 to 8.0 for a heartwarming story and a fantastic cast.

Today’s quick review: 13 Going on 30. After a wish on her 13th birthday, Jenna Rink (Christa B. Allen) wakes up in the body of her 30-year-old self (Jennifer Garner). Jenna soon finds out that she got her dream job as a magazine editor and leads the glamorous life she always wanted. But when Jenna realizes that her personal life is a mess, she sets out to reconnect with Matt (Mark Ruffalo), her former best friend, and make things right.

13 Going on 30 is a romantic comedy about a teenage girl who wakes up as her adult self. Jenna must figure out how to be a grown-up, navigate the disorienting world of the future, and fix all the things her adult self broke in pursuit of her career. 13 Going on 30 features a charming premise, light humor, and a spirited performance from Jennifer Garner. All of this is enough to make it a charming watch for the right audience.

13 Going on 30 perfectly captures the feel of a teenager living out an adult’s life. Jenna marvels at her newfound freedom, listens to her favorite bands from the 80s, shies away from dating, and approaches every interaction with a sunny optimism. Her innocence is refreshing, and it meshes well with the clues that her 30-year-old self is manipulative and cruel. She’s also balanced out well by Matt, who grew into a kind but reserved man.

13 Going on 30’s main drawback is that it skews a little childish. The tone is light and family-friendly, apart from one or two explicit jokes. The plot lacks any real substance, revolving around Jenna’s attempts to fix her life and her belated realization that she has feelings for Matt. And while Jenna’s teenage attitude is a ray of light in the cutthroat world she lives in, the movie makes it a little too easy for her to succeed.

13 Going on 30 is a fun popcorn watch for those in the mood for a light comedy with a dash of romance. The premise is simple and effective, the acting is enthusiastic, and the jokes are entertaining if not necessarily brilliant. 13 Going on 30 will not be for everyone, but its strengths make it worth a watch for anyone who likes joyful comedy.

For another romantic comedy about a woman trying to reconcile her teenage dreams with her grown-up reality, try Peggy Sue Got Married. For a comedy with a similar premise, check out Big. For one where a mother and daughter change places, try Freaky Friday. For a more mature comedy about a man given another chance to choose love over his career, try The Family Man. For a fantasy comedy about a man skipping through his life, try Click.

[6.2 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0337563/). I give it a 6.5 to 7.0 for a charming premise and an upbeat tone.

“Okay, ten-second pity party. Go.” —Ethan

Today’s quick review: Something Borrowed. Rachel (Ginnifer Goodwin) and Darcy (Kate Hudson) have been best friends since they were children. But Darcy drives a wedge between them when she acts on an old crush and sleeps with Darcy’s fiance Dex (Colin Egglesfield). With only weeks to go before the wedding, Rachel and Dex must sort out their feelings for each other and decide whether to come clean to Darcy or just move on.

Something Borrowed is a romantic comedy about two best friends who are both in love with the same man. What begins as a momentary lapse grows into a full-blown affair as Rachel and Dex give in to their attraction. Something Borrowed features a good cast and a promising setup, but it misplays its hand. Unlikable characters and a meandering plot undermine what could have been a charming story.

Something Borrowed suffers from an unusual problem: The characters lose support from the audience as the movie goes on. Rachel starts out as a kind, bookish woman who’s used to living in the shadow of her outgoing best friend. But she loses the moral high ground by sneaking around behind Darcy’s back and then lying about it. And while the movie acknowledges that she’s done something wrong, it never finds a satisfying way to build on that.

The same goes for the other characters. Dex starts out suave but gets less appealing as he wavers, ruining what is otherwise good chemistry with Rachel. Darcy is a shallow person who has an interesting friendship with Rachel, but she gets less amusing as she gets drunk, bends the truth, and takes advantage of her best friend. By the last leg of the movie, most of the characters are in a no-win situation of their own making.

These character issues feed into Something Borrowed’s other main problem: It doesn’t seem to know where to take its story. Instead of building up to a grand choice, the movie lurches along as Rachel and Dex keep going back and forth about their affair. There’s no sense of culmination, only a series of questionable decisions that make the situation more and more untenable, topped off with a couple of unsatisfying plot twists.

Still, Something Borrowed does have a few redeeming qualities. John Krasinski does a fantastic job as Rachel’s friend Ethan, whose sarcastic quips light up every scene he’s in. The actors are well-cast and the dynamics between them work well. And while the love triangle is not as clean as in other romances, it may appeal to viewers who like things morally ambiguous and realistically messy.

Something Borrowed is a decent movie that could have been a lot more. Its good cast and tangled situation will appeal to viewers who don’t mind the lying and cheating, but its character issues and unclear trajectory make it a poor fit for viewers looking for a breezy romantic comedy. Take a chance if you are interested, but casual viewers may want to steer clear.

For a lighter romantic comedy starring Kate Hudson about two best friends with a similar dynamic, try Bride Wars. For a romantic comedy with a similarly sneaky lead but a better payoff, try My Best Friend’s Wedding. For another romantic comedy about a woman who becomes involved with the fiance of someone close to her, try The Wedding Planner.

[5.9 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0491152/). I give it a 6.0 for misplaying a solid hand.

Today’s quick review: The Wedding Planner. Mary Fiore (Jennifer Lopez), a punctilious wedding planner, meets the man of her dreams when Steve Edison (Matthew McConaughey), a handsome pediatrician, saves her from a nasty accident. But just as their relationship is starting to bloom, Mary learns that Steve is actually the fiance of Fran Donolly (Bridgette Wilson-Sampras), Mary’s latest client.

The Wedding Planner is a romantic comedy about a wedding planner caught between her heart and her job. Still nursing the wounds from an old breakup, Mary dares to open up again, only to find that the man she’s in love with is already taken. The Wedding Planner features a fine premise and a decent cast, but it fails to capitalize on its assets. Mediocre plot work and chemistry keep it from standing up to the best the genre has to offer.

The Wedding Planner gets the character of Mary right but does not tell the right story about her. Mary is precise, polite, and controlling, traits that make her excellent at her job but cut her off from the prospect of romance. Her infatuation with Steve is the perfect opportunity for her to open up, but the movie never forces her to. Instead, she struggles but hardly grows, navigating a crisis but not being shaped by it.

Much of this has to do with the way The Wedding Planner handles Steve. Steve starts out as the perfect man, then dwindles as he gets wrapped up in wedding preparations and his own conflicting feelings towards Mary. Given the chance to be more proactive and establish real chemistry with Mary, Steve could have been the lynchpin holding the movie together. As it stands, Matthew McConaughey’s talents are not used to their fullest.

Even with these flaws, The Wedding Planner goes through the motions well enough. The love triangle has an unusual quality to it, both because Steve does not tell Mary about his engagement right away and because Mary has a strong professional interest in making sure Fran gets married. The plot has enough wrinkles to be engaging. And while the characters are not a major hit, they are enough to carry the story across the finish line.

The Wedding Planner is a decent pick if you are a fan of romantic comedies and are looking for a minor variation on the formula. Although the movie misplays its hand in a couple of key ways, it gets enough right to be worthwhile for the right viewer. Critical viewers would do better looking elsewhere.

For a more spirited romantic comedy with Matthew McConaughey, try Fool’s Gold. For a crime comedy with a hefty dose of romance starring Jennifer Lopez and George Clooney, try Out of Sight. For another romantic comedy about a love triangle that threatens to disrupt a wedding, try Made of Honor or My Best Friend’s Weddding.

[5.4 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209475/). I give it a 6.0 to 6.5 for a basic but enjoyable romance.

Today’s quick review: My Best Friend’s Wedding. Julianne Potter (Julia Roberts), a food critic who has never committed to a relationship, realizes she has made a huge mistake when Michael (Dermot Mulroney), her best friend of nine years, announces that he is getting married. Suddenly jealous, Julianne flies out to congratulate Michael, sabotage the wedding, and make sure that Michael chooses her over his fiance Kimmy (Cameron Diaz).

My Best Friend’s Wedding is a romantic comedy about a woman struggling with the realization that she’s in love with her best friend. The movie takes place over the course of one frantic weekend and Julianne stoops to lower and lower depths to undermine the wedding and get a second chance at Michael. My Best Friend’s Wedding offers an unusual take on the classic love triangle, making it an interesting watch for fans of the genre.

What makes My Best Friend’s Wedding is the character dynamics. Julianne has been taking Michael for granted, and the shock of losing him makes her try a series of desperate ploys to win him back. Kimmy is young and exuberant, but she has hidden depths that make her a difficult opponent. For his part, Michael has clear flaws but gets along well enough with both of the women to make a credible center of the movie.

The drawback to all of this is that My Best Friend’s Wedding does not have the same kind of payoff as other romantic comedies. The behavior of the characters can be childish, but the themes are mature, an examination of what qualities truly make for a lasting relationship. As such, viewers who are looking for triumphant gestures of love or an underdog heroine may be disappointed; the movie makes use of its setup in other ways.

How much you get out of My Best Friend’s Wedding will vary. Fans of romantic comedies will enjoy the space the movie plays in and the way Julianne wrestles with her unfamiliar feelings for Michael. But the situation is a little skewed compared to the typical setup, meaning that the movie does not have quite the same emotional or comedic impact. Give it a shot if you’re curious.

For a romantic comedy about the bride’s best friend trying to break up the wedding, try Made of Honor. For a romantic comedy with a similar perspective on love, try Four Weddings and a Funeral. For a romantic comedy about a woman who realizes she’s gone down the wrong path, try 13 Going on 30.

[6.3 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119738/). I give it a 6.5 to 7.0 for interesting ideas handled well.

Today’s quick review: The Accidental Husband. Emma Lloyd (Uma Thurman), a radio host with a detached view of love, ruins Patrick Sullivan’s (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) life when she talks his fiance into dumping him during a call-in to the show. As revenge, Patrick hacks the state computer system and fakes a prior marriage between him and Emma, forcing her to scramble to get the marriage annulled in time for her wedding to Richard (Colin Firth).

The Accidental Husband is a romantic comedy about a love guru whose theories about romance are put the test when she meets an impulsive firefighter. While trying to sort out the “glitch” that caused their marriage, Emma finds herself falling for Patrick, even though he’s the opposite of the man she always said she wanted.

The Accidental Husband has a decent premise, but its execution leaves something to be desired. Uma Thurman and Jeffrey Dean Morgan perform well individually but their chemistry is not strong enough to carry the film. The humor comes from a series of misunderstandings about Emma and Patrick’s marriage, but the movie drops that angle early on.

More broadly, The Accidental Husband makes a lot of small mistakes that blunt its impact. Moments that are supposed to be emotional are missing the setup, musical cues, and character reactions to make them work. Emma drifts through major revelations rather than engaging with them. Even the script does not have a clear endpoint in mind: The finale has none of the careful planning Emma espouses and little of the romance she’s tempted by.

All of this dampens what is otherwise a sound movie. Uma Thurman, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, and Colin Firth are all fine picks for their roles. The premise is a clever one for a romantic comedy. The movie does a lot of legwork to develop Patrick as a character and have Emma discover that he’s more than he seems. But without the charm to tie it all together, these efforts go to waste, making The Accidental Husband a mediocre pick.

For a romantic comedy with a similar premise and a weaker cast, try Accidentally Engaged. For one with more spark, check out The Proposal. For a romantic comedy about a dating advice show host whose theories get put to the test, check out The Ugly Truth. For a one about a love doctor who falls in love in spite of his best efforts, try Hitch.

[5.6 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0809504/). I give it a 5.5 for a decent premise that never hits its stride.

Today’s quick review: Just Married. Sarah (Brittany Murphy), a young woman from a wealthy family, defies her parents when she marries Tom (Ashton Kutcher), a small-time radio host with no class and no career prospects. But their love is put to the test during their honeymoon to Europe, where everything that can go wrong does.

Just Married is a romantic comedy about a newlywed couple whose marriage is nearly destroyed by a disastrous honeymoon. Ashton Kutcher and Brittany Murphy star as Tom and Sarah, two very different people who are brought together by love. Just Married employs the usual madcap comedy tricks, such as accidents, arguments, and misunderstandings. But although the premise works on paper, the story and the humor both miss the mark.

Just Married fails to sell Tom and Sarah as a couple. They have nothing in common, with different interests, expectations, and personalities. They argue constantly, they keep secrets from each other, and neither one displays any maturity. While some of the conflict is justified for the sake of comedy, it leaves the story little to work with. The only thing keeping Tom and Sarah together is passion, and even that comes across as forced.

This central problem weakens everything else the movie tries to do. Without the spark of love between Sarah and Tom, the audience has no real reason to want their relationship to work. The jokes are mediocre but could have been salvaged if the leads had better chemistry. And while the theme of love uniting people from different backgrounds is a classic one, the movie does not have a solid foundation to ignore it.

The result is a mediocre romantic comedy that only goes through the motions. Fans of Ashton Kutcher may get something out of Just Married, and anyone in the mood for light humor and marital arguments could do worse. But Just Married is missing the originality and the passion of its competition, making it an easy movie to skip.

For a sharper romantic comedy featuring Ashton Kutcher in an acrimonious marriage, try What Happens in Vegas. For another romantic comedy about a honeymoon gone wrong, try Honeymoon in Vegas or The Long, Long Trailer. For another comedy about a married couple on a nightmare trip, try The Out-of-Towners. For a crime comedy about Americans out of place in Europe, try Murder Mystery or Once Upon a Crime.

[5.5 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0305711/). I give it the same for weak chemistry and a flimsy plot.

Today’s quick review: Bride Wars. Ever since they were kids, Liv (Kate Hudson) and Emma (Anne Hathaway) have dreamed of getting married at the Plaza Hotel. Their dreams look like they are about to come true when their boyfriends (Steve Howey and Christ Pratt) propose within days of each other. But friendship turns to animosity when the wedding planner (Candice Bergen) accidentally books Liv and Emma’s weddings on the same day.

Bride Wars is a romantic comedy about two best friends who become bitter enemies when their dream weddings conflict with one another. Kate Hudson and Anne Hathaway star as Liv and Emma, two very different women who don’t realize how much they need each other. In the months leading up to the big day, Liv and Emma try everything in their power to sabotage each other and make their own weddings as glamorous as they always dreamed.

Bride Wars is not high art, and it is not trying to be. The premise is contrived and relies on poor decision-making on both sides. But given its premise, the movie has a lot of fun. Kate Hudson and Anne Hathaway are well-matched, the wedding sabotage is appropriately petty, and the movie even works in a pair of nice character arcs, where Liv has to learn to be less controlling and Emma has to learn to stand up for herself.

Bride Wars’ main failure is that it doesn’t leave enough time for its romantic relationships. Liv and Emma take center stage. Daniel (Steve Howey) and Fletcher (Chris Pratt) are afterthoughts. Ordinarily, this would be a reasonable choice for a movie about the brides, but the grooms have an important role to play later in the story, one that would have worked better with proper setup.

Bride Wars is a fun pick for anyone in the mood for some light bickering. The plot is a straightforward tale of a strained friendship, but the gags are pleasant, the cast is enthusiastic, and a few minor missteps do not hamper the movie too much. Fans of romantic comedies will get the most out of it, but anyone looking for a deep or insightful romance may want to steer clear.

For a comedy about the lead-up to a wedding from the perspective of the father, try The Week Of or either version of The Father of the Bride. For a comedy with a similar flavor involving a bride-to-be and her insufferable mother-in-law, try Monster-In-Law.

[5.5 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0901476/). I give it a 6.5 for breezy comedy without much substance.

Today’s quick review: The Sweetest Thing. Christina (Cameron Diaz), a party girl with a fear of commitment, begins to have unfamiliar feelings when she meets Peter (Thomas Jane) at a club. Urged on by her best friends Courtney (Christina Applegate) and Jane (Selma Blair), Christina takes a wild road trip to visit Peter at his brother Roger’s (Jason Bateman) wedding and tell him how she feels.

The Sweetest Thing is a raunchy romantic comedy starring Cameron Diaz. Packed with sex jokes and poor decision-making, The Sweetest Thing follows three party-loving friends as they navigate the pitfalls of casual dating. In spite of a talented cast and a low-stakes premise, the movie wastes its potential. Tasteless humor, weak character work, and an almost nonexistent plot make it a hard sell even for viewers who are interested.

The Sweetest Thing gambles on crude humor in a major way. Nearly every joke in the movie revolves around sex, and the handful that don’t are just as lowbrow. Even setting aside the content of the humor, the jokes have a low hit rate. The setups are contrived, the payoffs are uninspired, and many of the jokes only exist as filler. While The Sweetest Thing has a few funny ideas here and there, it never really hits its stride as a comedy.

The movie also misses with its characters. Christina, Courtney, and Jane are meant to come across as funny and spontaneous, but they cross the line into crass and inconsiderate. Normally, this would be fine for a raunchy comedy, but the characters are not likable enough to get away with it. The movie spends so little time treating them like people that there is no reason to side with them when the situation inevitably gets awkward.

The one redeeming quality of The Sweetest Thing is its cast. Cameron Diaz, Christina Applegate, and Selma Blair are fun, vivacious, and well-suited to their roles. If the script showed even a little more restraint, the trio could be the backbone of an excellent comedy. Instead, they are given jokes that are at best hit-or-miss and a story that barely bothers to go through the motions of romance.

The Sweetest Thing will have a niche for the right viewer. Its solid cast and explicit, over-the-top humor at least give it a distinct identity, and some audiences will appreciate what it has to offer. But the extremes it goes to will turn off most ordinary viewers, and the story and characters are not enough to make the jokes worthwhile. Approach with caution if you’re a fan of raunchy comedies, and steer clear otherwise.

For a better use of Cameron Diaz, try What Happens in Vegas or Knight and Day. For a raunchy comedy with a little more heart, try That’s My Boy. For one with similar problems, try Game Over, Man!. For a more romantic movie about a woman chasing after a man she barely knows, try Sleepless in Seattle.

[5.2 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0253867/). I give it a 4.5 for dodgy humor and a negligible plot.

“She’s awfully hostile for a girl named Joy.” —Jack

Today’s quick review: What Happens in Vegas. After a night of partying in Las Vegas, Joy (Cameron Diaz), a trader who was just dumped, and Jack (Ashton Kutcher), a slacker who was just fired, wake up to find they are married. But their plans for a quick divorce are put on hold when they win $3 million on a slot machine. Now Joy and Jack have to stay together for six months before they can split the cash and go their separate ways.

What Happens in Vegas is a romantic comedy starring Cameron Diaz and Ashton Kutcher. Married by mistake in Vegas, Joy and Jack are ordered to give their marriage an honest try before a judge will let them touch the money they won. With $1.5 million to gain by getting the other one to walk away, Jack and Joy set out to make each other’s lives miserable using every childish trick they can think of.

Cameron Diaz and Ashton Kutcher make for a great comedy duo. Joy and Jack are polar opposites in terms of their careers and attitudes towards life, but they share the same sense of petty vindictiveness. What begins as a few hurled insults quickly escalates into a full-blown marital war, complete with pranks and sabotage. Seeing them try to one-up each other time and time again is a treat.

The main shortcoming of What Happens in Vegas is that it skimps on romance. Instead of building to true love and a grand romantic gesture, the movie aims for the lower bar of mutual respect. What Happens in Vegas does a good job of showing how Joy and Jack bring out the best in each other, at least when they stop fighting, but their relationship is missing the tenderness needed to be fully satisfying.

What Happens in Vegas is not high art, but it is a worthwhile watch for anyone who likes its leads. The comedy is colorful and just exaggerated enough to be fun, and while the romance does not have everything a viewer could want, the plot progression is capably handled. Give it a shot when you are in the mood for some quick laughs.

For another comedy about a fan forced to jump through hoops by a judge’s sentence, try Anger Management. For a witty romantic comedy with a similarly cavalier attitude towards divorce, try Intolerable Cruelty. For a comedy about a slacker who learns to take responsibility, try Big Daddy.

[6.1 out of 10 on IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1033643/). I give it a 6.5 to 7.0 for fun humor and a decent premise.